Drivers for app-based ride-hailing and delivery services filed a lawsuit Tuesday to overturn a California ballot initiative that makes them independent contractors instead of employees eligible for benefits and job protections. The lawsuit filed with the California Supreme Court said Proposition 22 is unconstitutional because it limits the power of the Legislature to grant workers the right to organize and excludes drivers from being eligible for workers’ compensation. The measure, which was passed in November with 58% support, was the most expensive in state history with Uber Lyft and other services pouring $200 million in support of it. Labor unions, who joined drivers in the lawsuit, spent about $20 million to challenge it. "Prop. 22 doesn’t just fail our state rideshare drivers, it fails the basic test of following our state constitution," said Bob Schoonover of the SEIU union. "The law as written by Uber and Lyft denies drivers rights under the law in California and makes it nearly impossible for lawmakers to fix these problems." Drivers bringing the lawsuit have several hurdles to clear, but their arguments are compelling, said Mary-Beth Moylan, associate dean of McGeorge Law School in Sacramento. The first challenge is getting the California Supreme Court… Read full this story
- Gig driver or Uber/Lyft employee? It affects unemployment benefits
- Uber and Lyft say regulator can’t make drivers employees
- Uber drivers protest coronavirus safety program at CEO’s SF home
Some Uber, Lyft drivers sue over California ballot measure have 233 words, post on www.independent.co.uk at January 12, 2021. This is cached page on Trend . If you want remove this page, please contact us.